tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7812122988443051809.post7352477018918713492..comments2023-12-03T17:10:09.097-08:00Comments on Robert E. Burke Genealogy: George Womack, son of Thomas Womack and Louvisa RiceRobert Burkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03342639876747426955noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7812122988443051809.post-11614048486737767672009-10-04T21:19:24.748-07:002009-10-04T21:19:24.748-07:00This is an interesting new theory. My ancestor wa...This is an interesting new theory. My ancestor was Green B., dob 1832, son of Margaret and either George or James.<br /><br />What reason do you have to think that Thomas and Louvisa had a son named George? What makes you think he, rather than James, married Margaret?<br /><br />What happened to James? I had some correspondence a few years ago with Beth Howser. She said that James died in Pope County, but I don’t know if she had a source for that.<br /><br />I found George in the 1830 census as you mentioned, and the ages all seem to match fairly closely. Of course Margaret is widowed by 1840. Do you think the older woman living with Margaret in 1840 could be Louvisa? She is about the right age.PEGGYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04597198283693463320noreply@blogger.com